REC's IRP - Some in favour and some not

Great article on Page 12 of Recruiter Magazine, 8 July 09 – IRP: tweaking or enhancing.

I was intrigued by the debate between some of REC’s heavyweights p12, 8 July 09, IRP: tweaking or enhancing, which discussed the timing and merits of REC’s new Institute of Recruitment Professionals.

Naturally time will tell if it is the wrong or right move and it was refreshing to see it reported that Peter Searle from Spring was in full support and one of REC’s Fellows, Steve Huxham, painted a different picture.

Let’s face it, recruiters are salespeople and salespeople want to earn money, therefore, to throw a little relevant research into the debate, a recent report from the UK’s leading Professional Management Organisations delivered by the Consultative Committee for Professional Management Organisations confirmed the following;

“The estimated lifetime economic benefit associated with holding professional qualifications and membership of a professional institute is approximately £152,000 in today’s money terms. This is comprised of £81,000 from holding professional qualifications, and £71,000 from holding membership of a professional institute.”

Perhaps this will be a factor if individual recruiters acknowledge that membership of IRP or sitting REC qualifications will positively effect the back pocket.

I personally feel any steps to professionalise any industry are good news, and in light of REC’s recent focus on Phoenixing in the industry, more professionals adhering to best and fair practice can only increase the perception of recruiters by employers in what is an extremely challenging market.

Phoenixing

The REC is inviting Government to take a tough stance on Phoenixing as highlighted in Recruitment Consultant Magazine today.

I remember an REC event last year where some senior figures in the recruitment industry were laughing about how this was how they had made their money in the sector, so this practice seems to be quite common and at all levels in the industry.

I left the conversation at the point this was raised because I have no time for people who create other's misery and as an ex employee of the REC, I like them, would love to see this stamped out and those who have profited exposed.

Well done REC, cast the net far and wide and look into all the nooks and crannies.

Mixed messages regarding impact of job boards on HR hiring

I was with one of the largest UK job boards last week and largest UK recruiters this week and received mixed messages about the impact of job boards on HR's hiring activity.

The job board indicated that direct employers were just not posting and that recruiters were still and always have been the predominant user of its boards.

The recruiter indicated that they have lost considerable business to job boards with direct employers choosing to test the online channels available.

I'm interested in the community's intelligence on this matter because I would like to pull some representative statistics together to share with the community.

Many thanks.